Skip to main content

A minor character flaw

Dear Members and Constituents,
How much does a character typed on an e-mail contribute to global warming? Until recently, I had taken it for granted that electronic communications were "clean", with zero impact on the environment. I started having second thoughts when I read 1.5% of the world's electric supply is consumed by server farms (and growing at a fairly substantial rate).

Rather than go on faith alone, I figured I'd do the math... Before we go on, here are the disclaimers on my analysis: (a) it is based on the top results of my Google searches, (b) the math was not double-checked, (c) sources were not scrubbed for reliability and (d) they are not cited. Therefore, (e) these findings should be interpreted as directional.

If we consider there are approximately 150 billion e-mails being sent every day and the average number of words per e-mail is about 110 -with an average word length (in the English language) of 5.1 characters, then we have approximately 30 quadrillion (15 zeroes) characters being e-mailed per year.

I could not get a more recent figure (I'm sure it's out there), however in 2005, the worldwide energy consumption was 500 exa-Joules (EJ --18 zeroes), 86% of which was created by burning fossil fuels. If we go back to 1.5% of this supply being used by server farms, that leaves 7.5 EJ (6.5 EJ from fossil fuels). Keep in mind that only about 1.5% of internet traffic is actually e-mail, which leaves 100 peta-Joules (15 zeroes) of carbon-emitting electricity used for e-mail.

If you divide these two figures out (total characters e-mailed and fossil-fuel-based energy used to power them), you get 3.17 Joules of electricity per-character e-mailed. Fossil fuels emit between 60 (natural gas) and 90 (coal) kilograms of CO2 per giga-Joule (9 zeroes). If we use the average of 75 Kilograms (165 pounds), we get 0.0000005 lbs of CO2 for every character you type and send on an e-mail. That means that with 2,625 characters in this e-mail (including spaces), 0.0012 lbs of CO2 were emitted per recipient. With 60 recipients, this e-mail may be responsible for an astounding 1/12 of a pound of CO2 (if these calculations hold). Now before you start driving places instead of sending e-mails, you should know a gallon of gas produces 19.4 pounds of CO2 as it gets burned in your car.

Fortunately, walking over to my desk to grab a donut does not require you burn any fossil fuels and Rich Law's donut selection ensures your trip is highly likely to be worthwhile. So, come on down and grab a bite (in-fact, a giga-bite may be in good order today), besides, the walk should help build some... character.
Happy Friday!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Donut Doodle Dandy

Dear Members and Constituents, In trying to figure-out Wednesday’s cool-looking Google Doodle ( Jorge Luis Borges’ 112 th birthday ), I stumbled across a list of Google Doodles you’ll never see. This, and a Rockies game later that day, were sufficient inspiration to get my head spinning around what other doodles Google might never noodle? I’m sure you’ll probably have a few ideas of your own, but I was able to come-up with a couple. How about a former Colorado Rockies player whose unfortunate encounter with a moth put him in the news this week? The Matt Holliday doodle might look something like this… Another item which, surprisingly enough, has not been made into a doodle are donuts. Although I was slightly taken aback to find this delicious pastry has not been featured, after the initial disappointment, I decided to take matters into my own hands and take a stab at one (perhaps Google can use it next year for national donut day )… or to celebrate Greek police having “ blown a ho

Donut Hole Alignment

Friends, My predawn attempts to watch the planetary alignment have thus far been met with cloudy skies. The weather forecast through the end of the cosmic event suggests I shall not witness it. And yet, my futile attempts have been rewarded in other ways. The chorus of birds, frogs and insects singing in anticipation of the sun’s glorious rising complement the river’s steady churning. The crisp, fresh air in a desolate town whose citizens are still bidding Morpheus “adieu” caresses my skin while the sweet aroma of petrichor fills my lounges. Deep shadows of centenarian eucalyptus trees slowly recede and give way to the imperceptible progress of the brightening skies. Sure, witnessing those tiny bright spots lined-up in the sky would be pretty cool —like sprinkles on a donut. Speaking of donuts, if you’re ever in Cuenca around the feast of Corpus Christi (which ended yesterday) you need to try the Huevos Chilenos (Chilean Eggs) —think of them as less sweet donut holes. And, if like me t

Donuts Without Borders

Friends, I believe going anywhere in the world (so long as you abide by the local laws) should be a human right. People should be allowed to wander freely (or vote with their feet whenever a government alienates them). In this, I fully support Doctors Without Borders’ decision to no longer accept funding from the EU due to their immigration policies. Good for them! That said borders can be useful. Take, for instance national sports teams. If there were no borders, events like the summer and winter Olympiads would not exist. Closer to home, those of you who follow soccer are probably tuning-in to the hundredth edition of Copa America , currently under way. Last night the quarter final opener featured both of the teams for which I've been rooting. Who do you cheer for when you know only one of your teams will advance? You can't root for both or you risk becoming a dispassionate observer, so, you either pick one or choose to narrate the game in English (i.e. no 100 MPH narra